Thursday, October 18, 2007

Rules and Regulations


Years ago I remember reading a book called Hawaii. This was a fictionalized account of the founding of Hawaii. One of the things that happened was that when the missionaries arrived they realized that the Hawaiian people were have too much intercourse. They did not like this. They wanted to push the idea of marriage and of course the missionary position. They thought that they might create a law that forbid all the types of congress that they did not approve of. They realized that if they did this that this would just give the Hawaiians ideas on things to do that they had not thought of. So this is the law they came up with:

any other species of lewdness be committed, such as is not mentioned in this law, the judge shall consider it well, according to the best of his knowledge, he shall pass sentence in accordance with the general spirit of the law. Thus shall he punish that crime
In other words, we aren't going to tell you what is bad, but don't do it.

The SEC years ago decided that if they specified all of the illegal things that banks and stock brokers should not do that they would provide a gold mine for lawyers looking for loopholes. For instance there is a section of the tax code that says you should not do any financial maneuver just to avoid taxes. This is much better than telling you what you can't specifically do. It relies on the reasonable interpretation of good behavior.

I have been reminded of this with all the controversy surrounding the memos written in a Queens high school about what to do in case of an emergency. It would seem that the part that is missing is to do what makes sense in the situation. If you are looking to create a series of rules to govern behavior, sometimes less is more.

Of course you need guidelines in any organization. You need to tell people the clear chain of command, but then you have to trust people to do the right thing if the chain doesn't make sense. The memo should have started by saying that everyone was expected to do what is appropriate if they feel someone is in danger and then go on to describe what to do if they are not. All these explicit memos do is feed into the control mentality that too often governs schools while avoiding making people responsible for their own actions.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

You wrote:

> Of course you need guidelines in any
> organization. You need to tell
> people the clear chain of command, but
> then you have to trust people to do
> the right thing if the chain doesn't make
> sense.

One of the reasons for a "chain of command is that people cannot be always be trusted to do the right thing. In schools administrators and teachers often do not do the right thing especially when observing colleagues interacting with students.

- - - - - - - - - -

> The memo should have
> started by saying that everyone was
> expected to do what is appropriate if
> they feel someone is in danger and then go
> on to describe what to do if
> they are not.

You cannot run an organization beginning with "everyone is expected to do the right thing."
Who decides what is appropriate? There are too many instances of folks doing the wrong things without supervision or accountability.

- - - - - - - - - -

> All these explicit memos do is
> feed into the control
> mentality that too often governs schools
> while avoiding making people
> responsible for their own actions.

I agree that schools too frequently operate under a "control mentality" but it is naive to think that people will simply do the right thing.

Anonymous said...

Happy late mole day Susse, hope you're doing alright.

Anonymous said...

hi ed,
just came across and read some of your blog notes. had i known, you would have had my support. not sure im as good as political thinker as you give me credit for but ive managed to survive the re-orgs as an EA so...

life is long road...

htl